Member-only story
Gaza’s anti-Hamas protests mean different things to different players
By James M. Dorsey
Hi and welcome,
If you appreciate hard-hitting, fact-based analysis, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription. By doing so, you help ensure the survival of independent journalism and analysis. The Turbulent World depends on your support.
Subscribing will allow you to listen to the podcast, and/ or watch the video associated with this story. To subscribe, please click here.
Thank you for your support and loyalty, take care, and best wishes.
The United Arab Emirates is betting that recent anti-Hamas protests in Gazan towns, supported by influential tribes and clans, will strengthen Abu Dhabi-based Mohammed Dahlan’s chances of playing a prominent role in the territory’s post-war administration.
Protesters suggested they focussed their demands on Hamas because the group was the one party they were most likely to influence.
“We want to stop the killing and displacement, no matter the price. We can’t stop Israel from killing us, but we can press Hamas to give concessions,” said Mohammed Abu Saker, a father of three.
“We are not against the resistance. We are against war. Enough wars, we are tired,” another protester said.
Some protesters took issue with Israeli portrayals of the protests as an uprising against Hamas rather than against everyone, including Hamas, Israel, the West Bank-based, internationally recognised Palestine Authority, the Arabs, and the international community.
“Everyone failed us,” a third protester said.
“People are angry at the whole world… We want Hamas to resolve this situation, return the hostages, and end this whole thing,” said yet another.
Israeli officials, including Defence Minister Israel Katz, encouraged Gazans to sustain the protests because expelling Hamas from Gaza was the only way Israel would end the war.
